En savoir plus

Ressources connexes sur le site TA@l’école

Compétences des élèves

Assurer le bon déroulement des travaux scolaires : rester organisé grâce à des organisateurs graphiques

Un regard approfondi sur les fonctions exécutives

Techniques d'enseignement

Planifier et enseigner dans le cadre de l’enseignement explicite

L’enseignement explicite : une stratégie d’enseignement efficace en lecture, en écriture et en mathématiques

La différenciation pédagogique

Conception universelle de l’apprentissage (CUA)

Comment faire participer activement les élèves ayant des TA au processus d’apprentissage et d’évaluation?

Technologie d’assistance

Technologie pour tous : soutenir les élèves ayant des troubles d’apprentissage en intégrant la technologie dans la classe

Foire aux questions (FAQ) : Perfectionnement des compétences grâce à la technologie d’assistance

Qu’est-ce qui peut influencer l’efficacité des aides technologiques utilisées par les élèves ayant des troubles d’apprentissage?

La technologie en lecture

La technologie en écriture

Technologie en mathématiques

Évaluations et technologies d’aide : trois cas particuliers

L’apport des technologies d’aide à l’école secondaire : perspectives des professionnels de l’enseignement et des élèves

Français

QRAC-the-Code : une approche pour favoriser la gestion de la compréhension de texte auprès d’élèves du secondaire

Apprendre au cerveau à lire : stratégies pour améliorer le décodage, la fluidité et la compréhension de lecture

L’approche SRSD : stratégie d’autorégulation pour améliorer l’écriture des élèves ayant des TA

Enregistrement de webinaire : Les cercles d’auteurs pour soutenir les élèves en difficulté en écriture

Améliorer la compréhension de textes littéraires chez les élèves ayant des TA du niveau intermédiaire : le réseau de personnages

Quelles sont les stratégies pour enseigner la lecture et l’écriture aux élèves ayant des TA au niveau intermédiaire (7e à 10e année)?

VIDÉO : Trouble d’apprentissage en langage écrit : survol et adaptations

L’enjeu oublié : l’enseignement de la lecture stratégique au secondaire et les élèves ayant des troubles d’apprentissage

Stratégies pour aider les élèves qui éprouvent des difficultés en écriture

Mathématiques

ENREGISTREMENT DE WEBINAIRE – La résolution de problèmes avec des élèves en difficulté d’apprentissage: de l’arithmétique à l’algèbre.

Les mathématiques et la mentalité de croissance

MODULE D’APPRENTISSAGE : Stratégies concrètes, représentationnelles et abstraites dans l’enseignement des mathématiques

Comment puis-je appuyer les élèves des cycles intermédiaire et supérieur qui éprouvent des difficultés en lien avec leur mémoire de travail lorsqu’ils tentent de résoudre des problèmes de mathématiques?

VIDÉO : Comment la conception universelle de l’apprentissage remédie aux difficultés d’apprentissage en mathématiques

L’utilisation efficace des diagrammes en mathématiques

Les TA en mathématiques : interventions, stratégies et ressources factuelles

L’analyse de l’erreur en mathématiques

L’heuristique mathématique et la résolution de problèmes

La représentation visuelle en mathématiques

Science

Enseigner les sciences aux élèves du secondaire ayant des TA : 5 pratiques pédagogiques efficaces

Tous les élèves peuvent « lire pour apprendre » en sciences!

L'histoire

Enseigner l’histoire aux élèves du secondaire ayant des TA : considérations et stratégies pédagogiques

Autres articles intéressants

Comprendre les troubles d’apprentissage – Incidence du traitement sur l’apprentissage

Quels sont les signes avant-coureurs du TDAH à reconnaître par les enseignants chez leurs élèves de sexe féminin?

Le soutien au développement de l’autodétermination, un levier pour engager les apprenants

Les cours en ligne conviennent-ils aux élèves ayant des TA?

Décloisonnement des cours théoriques et appliqués en 9e année : quelles seront les répercussions sur les élèves ayant des TA?

La collaboration des professionnels de l’enseignement et la réussite des élèves ayant des troubles d’apprentissage : Un examen de la recherche

Collaboration de l’équipe-école dans les écoles secondaires

Bibliographie

Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. The Journal of Special Education, 3(13), 300-324.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 251-276.

Berkeley, S., & Riccomini, P. J. (2013). QRAC-the-code: A comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 154-165. 10.1177/0022219411409412

Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing Students' Potential through Creative Math. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer Imprints.

Bouck, E. C., & Sprick, J. (2019). The Virtual-Representational-Abstract Framework to Support Students With Disabilities in Mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(3), 173-180.

Brady, P. (2008). Working towards a model of secondary school culture. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 73, 1-26.

Bulgren, J. A., Marquis, J. G., Lenz, B. K., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (2011). The effectiveness of a question-exploration routine for enhancing the content learning of secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 578.

Carnine, D., Crawford, D., Harniss, M., & Hollebeck, K. (1996). Understanding U.S. history : Vol.1 - Through 1914. Considerate Pub.

Carruthers, P., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (1996). Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

Conzemius, A. E., & O'Neill, J. (2014). The handbook for SMART school teams: Revitalizing best practices for collaboration (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Cramer, E., Liston, A., Nevin, A., & Thousand, J. (2010). Co-teaching in urban secondary school districts to meet the needs of all teachers and learners: Implications for teacher education reform. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 6(2), 59-76.

De La Paz, S. (1999). Teaching writing strategies and self-regulation procedures to middle school students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1-16.

Dexter, D., & Hughes, C. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 51-72.

Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 51-72.

Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and Math/Science Achievement. Growthmindsetmaths.com. Retrieved November 19, 2019, from https://www.growthmindsetmaths.com/uploads/2/3/7/7/23776169/mindset_and_math_science_achievement_-_nov_2013.pdf

Dweck, C. S. (2015, September 22). Carol Dweck revisits the growth mindset. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinion-carol-dweck-revisits-the-growth-mindset/2015/09

Firestone, W. A., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Schools as cultures. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (2nd ed., pp. 297-322). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2007). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. s., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 7(12), 279-320.

Graham, S. (1999). The role of text production skills in writing development: A special issue. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22, 75-77. doi:10.2307/1511267

Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2009). lmost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with The Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research, 24, 58-68.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.

Graves, M. F. (1988). Some Characteristics of Memorable Expository Writing: Effects of Revisions by Writers with Different Backgrounds. Research in the Teaching of English, 22(3), 242-265.

Hallahan, D., Kauffman, J., McIntryre, L., & Mykota, D. (2010). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education.

Hargreaves, A., & Macmillan, R. (1995). The balkanization of teaching. In L. S. Siskin & J. W. Little (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp. 141- 171). Teachers College Press.

Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140-148.

Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H., de Jong, T., & Wilhelm, P. (2009). The effects of representational format on learning combinatorics from an interactive computer simulation. Instructional Science, 37, 503-517.

Kosanovich, M. (2013). Promoting reading comprehension in secondary students with LD. Council for Learning Disabilities. http://www.council-for-learning-disabilities.org/promoting-reading-comprehension-in-secondary-students-with-learning-disabilities

LDAHH. (2001, October 18). Tips on Time Management. Learning Disabilities Association of Halton-Hamilton. Retrieved May 17, 2020, from https://ldahh.ca/blog/tips-on-time-management/

Liang, L., Watkins, N., & Day, D. (2013, Oct/Nov). Selecting quality nonfiction classroom texts that meet CCSS qualifications. Reading Today, 25-26.

MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61-73.

Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional children, 58, 270-279.

Mason, L. H., & Hedin, L. (2011). Reading science text: Challenges for students with learning disabilities and considerations for teachers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 214-222.

Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2010). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Graetz, J. E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning disability quarterly, 26(2), 103-116.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Levin, J. R., Gaffney, J., & McLoone, B. (1985). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction for learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8(1), 57-63.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., & Connors, N. (2006). Differentiated Curriculum Enhancement in Inclusive Middle School Science Effects on Classroom and High-Stakes Tests. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130-137.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(1), 52-65.

Montague, M. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164-177.

Murwaski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258-267.

Okolo, C. M., & Ferretti, R. P. (2013). History instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Pitcher, B., & Fang, Z. (2007). Can we trust levelled texts? An examination of their reliability and quality from a linguistic perspective. Literacy, 41(1), 43-51.

Province of British Columbia. (2011). Supporting Students with Learning Disabilities: A Guide for Teachers. https://www.srsd119.ca/departments/teacherinformation/SSS/stategies_resources/SupportingStudentswLearningDisabilitiesProvinceBC.pdf

Rasinski, T., Padak, N., Newton, R. M., Newton, E., & Bromley, K. (2008). Greek & Latin roots. Huntington Beach, CA: Teacher Created Materials.

Robinson, K., & Hutchinson, N. (2014, July 30). Math Heuristics. LD@school. https://www.ldatschool.ca/math-heuristics/

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). eaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of educational research, 66(2), 181-221.

Rousseau, N., Paquet-Bélanger, N., Stanké, B., & Bergeron, L. (2014). Pédagogie universelle and technologie d’aide : deux voies com­plé­mentaires favorisant le soutien tantôt collectif, tantôt individuel aux apprentis­sages. In N. Rousseau & V. Angelucci (Eds.), Les aides technologiques à l’apprentissage pour soutenir l’inclusion scolaire (pp. 5-38). Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities Expository Versus Narrative Text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31-41.

Saino, P., Eklund, K., Ahonen, T., & Kiuru, N. (2019). The Role of Learning Difficulities in Adolescents’ Academic Emotions and Academic Acheivement. Journal of Learning Disabilities., 52(4), 288-298.

Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2009). Teachers Make the Difference: Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities at Middle and Secondary Levels. LD@school. https://www.ldatschool.ca/teachers-make-the-difference-teaching-students-with-learning-disabilities-at-middle-and-secondary-levels-saskatchewan-ministry-of-education-2009/

Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Marshak, L., & Lloyd, J. (2011). Science and Social Studies. In J. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 445-455). New York: Routledge.

Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Sullivan, G. S. (1994). Promoting relational thinking skills: Elaborative interrogation for mildly handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 60, 450-457.

Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Sullivan, G. S., & Hesser, L. S. (1993). Improving reasoning and recall: The differential effects of elaborative interrogation and mnemonic elaboration. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(3), 233-240.

Sullivan, G. S., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1995). Reasoning and remembering coaching students with learning disabilities to think. The Journal of Special Education, 29(3), 310-322.

Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading Research for Students with LD A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Outcomes. Journal of learning disabilities, 32(6), 504-532.

Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67-80). New York: Guilford Press.

Troia, G. (2011). How might pragmatic language skills affect the written expression of students with language learning disabilities? Top Language Disorders, 31, 40-53.

van Garderen, D. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 540-553.

van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246-254.

van Garderen, D., & Scheuermann, A. (2015). Diagramming word problems: A strategic approach for instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 282-290. 10.1177/1053451214560889

van Garderen, D., & Scheuermann, A. (2015). Diagramming word problems: A strategic approach for instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 282-290.

van Garderen, D., Scheuermann, A., & Jackson, C. (2012). Examining how students with diverse abilities use diagrams to solve mathematics word problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 145-160. 10.1177/0731948712438558

Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (2009). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behaviour problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Villanueva, M., Taylor, J., Therrien, W., & Hand, B. (2012). Science education for students with special needs. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 187-215.

Voss, J. F., & Silfies, L. N. (1996). Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 45-68.

Weiner, J., & Schneider, B. (2002). A multisource exploration of friendship patterns of children with and without LD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 127-141.

Weiser, B. (2013). Effective vocabulary instruction for kindergarten to 12th grade students experiencing learning disabilities. Council for Learning Disabilities. http://www.council-for-learning-disabilities.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Vocabulary-Word-2013.pdf

Witzel, B. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math learning disabilities in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 49-60.

Zahner, D., & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 177-204.