Ressources pertinentes sur le site Web de TA@l’école
Veuillez consulter les pages du module pour des ressources pertinentes aux concepts couverts dans chaque section. Les ressources suivantes sont d’autres ressources disponibles sur le site Web de TA@l’école qui ne sont pas mentionnées ailleurs dans le module.
Cliquer ici afin d’accéder à l’article Concevoir des sites Web de classe accessibles.
Cliquer ici afin d’accéder à l’article TDAH et fonctions d’aide technologiques.
Cliquer ici afin d’accéder à l’article Utilisation de la technologie.
Cliquer ici afin d’accéder à l’article Technologies d’aide incluses sur les appareils mobiles.
Ressources supplémentaires
Cliquer ici afin d’accéder au cahier Troubles d’apprenissage : les technologies à la rescousse.
Références
Adcock, W., Luna, E., Parkhurst, J., Poncy, B., Skinner, C. et Yaw, J. (2010). « Effective class-wide remediation: Using technology to identify idiosyncratic math facts for additional automaticity drills », The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6, p. 111-123.
Amiripour, P., Bijan-zadeh, M. H., Pezeshki, P. et Najafi, M. (2011). « Effects of assistive technology instruction on increasing motivation and capacity of mathematical problem solving in dyscalcula student », Educational Research, 2(10), p. 1611-1618.
Bergeron, L., Rousseau, N. et St.Vincent, L.-A. (2012). Défis et enjeux liés à l'utilisation des technologies d'aide en contexte scolaire. Revue suisse de pédagogie spécialisée, 4, 31-39.
Bethell, S. et Miller, N. (1998). « From an E to an A in first year algebra with the help of a graphing calculator », Mathematics Teacher, 91, p. 118-119.
Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Taber-Doughty, T., Flanagan, S. M. et Szwed, K. (2009). « Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with mild intellectual disabilities », Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, p. 367-380.
Bouck, E. et Flanagan, S. (2009). « Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education », Journal of Special Education Technology, 24, p. 24-30.
Bouck, E., Flanagan, S., Miller, B. et Bassette, L. (2012). « Technology In Action », Journal of Special Education Technology, 27, p. 47-57.
Chiang, H. et Jacobs, K. (2009). « Effect of computer-based instruction on students’ self-perception and functional task performance », Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(2), p. 106-118. DOI : 10.1080/17483100802613693
Council of Ontario Directors of Education. (2017). Fonds pour la technologie et l’apprentissage : Guide de mise en œuvre 2017. Repéré à http://www.ontariodirectors.ca/CODE-TLF/docs/tel-2017/Technology_and_Learning_Fund_Fr-2017.pdf
Cullen, J., Richards, S. B. et Frank, C. L. (2008). « Using software to enhance the writing skills of students with special needs », Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, p. 33-44.
Doughty, T., Bouck, E., Bassette, L., Szwed, K. et Flanagan, S. (2013). « Spelling on the fly: Investigating a pentop computer to improve the spelling skills of three elementary students with disabilities », Assistive Technology, 25, p. 166-175. DOI : 10.1080/10400435.2012.743491
Englert, C. S., Wu, X. et Zhao, Y. (2005). « Cognitive tools for writing: Scaffolding the performance of students through technology », Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, p. 184-198. DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00132.x
Englert, C. S., Zhao, Y., Dunsmore, K., Collings, N. Y. et Woblers, K. (2007). « Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an Internet-based technology to improve performance », Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, p. 9-29. DOI : 10.2307/30035513
Evmenova, A., Graff, H., Jerome, M. et Behrmann, M. (2010). « Word prediction programs with phonetic spelling support: Performance comparisons and impact on journal writing for students with writing difficulties », Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(4), p. 170-182. DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00315.x
Fasting, R. B. et Halaas Lyster, S. (2005). « The effects of computer technology in assisting the development of literacy in young struggling readers and spellers », European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(1), p. 21-40. DOI : 10.1080/0885625042000319061
Fédération des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario. (s.d.). Technologie d’aide (TA). Repéré à https://www.teachspeced.ca/fr/technologie-d-aide
Graham, S. (1999). « The role of text production skills in writing development: A special issue », Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 22, p. 75-77. DOI : 10.2307/1511267
Handley-More, D., Dietz, J., Billingsley, F. et Coggins, T. (2003). « Facilitating written work using computer word processing and word prediction », The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, p. 139-151. DOI : 10.5014/ajot.57.2.139
Hecker, L., Burns, L., Elkind, J., Elkind, K. et Katz, L. (2002). « Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders », Annals of Dyslexia, 52, p. 243-272. DOI : 10.1007/s11881-002-0015-8
Higgins, E. L. et Raskind, M. H. (2000). « Speaking to read: A comparison of continuous vs. discrete speech recognition in the remediation of learning disabilities », Journal of Special Education Technology, 15, p. 19-30.
Holmes, A. et Silvestri, R. (2009). Text-to-voice technology in adult aboriginal sample with reading difficulties: Examination of the efficacy. Toronto, ON : Bureau de l’éducation des Autochtones du ministère de l’Éducation et ministère de la Formation et des Collèges et Universités.
Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education. (2003). Graphic organizers: A review of scientifically based research. Prepared for Inspiration Software at AEL.
Izzo, M., Yurick, A. et McArrell, B. (2009). « Supported eText: Effects of text-to-speech on access and achievement for high school students with disabilities », Journal of Special Education Technology, 24, p. 9-20.
Lee, Y. et Vail, C. O. (2005). « Computer-based reading instruction for young children with disabilities », Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, p. 5-18.
Lewis, R. (1998). « Assistive technology and learning disabilities: Today’s realities and tomorrow’s promises », Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, p. 16-26.
Lewis, R., Graves, A., Ashton, T. et Kieley, C. (1998). « Word processing tools for students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies to increase text entry speed », Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, p. 95-108.
MacArthur, C. A. (1999). « Word prediction for students with severe spelling problems », Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, p. 158-172. DOI : 10.2307/1511283
MacArthur, C. (2009). « Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers », Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), p. 93-103. DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00283.x
MacArthur, C. et Cavalier, A. (2004). « Dictation and speech recognition technology as test accommodations », Exceptional Children, 71(1), p. 43-58. DOI : 10.1177/001440290407100103
MacArthur, C. A., Ferretti, R. P., Okolo, C. M. et Cavalier, A. R. (2001). « Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review », The Elementary School Journal, 101(3), p. 273-301. DOI : 10.1086/499669
Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario. (2004). Plan d’enseignement individualisé (PEI) : Guide. Repéré à http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/fre/general/elemsec/speced/guide/resource/iepresguidf.pdf
Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario. (2013). L’apprentissage pour tous : Guide d’évaluation et d’enseignement efficaces pour tous les élèves de la maternelle à la 12e année. Repéré à http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/fre/general/elemsec/speced/LearningforAll2013Fr.pdf
Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario. (2016). Définir les compétences du 21e siècle pour l’Ontario : document de réflexion. Repéré à https://pedagogienumeriqueenaction.cforp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Definir-les-competences-du-21e-siecle-pour-l_Ontario-Document-de-reflexion-phase-1-2016.pdf
Montali, J. et Lewandowski, L. J. (1996). « Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers », Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, p. 271-279. DOI : 10.1177/002221949602900305
Okolo, C. M. et Diedrich, J. (2014). « Twenty-five years later: How is technology used in the education of students with disabilities? Results of a statewide study ». Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(1), p. 1-20.
Peterson-Karlan, G. R. (2011). « Technology to support writing by students with learning and academic disabilities: Recent research trends and findings », Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 7(1), p. 39-62.
Raskind, M. et Higgins, E. (1995). « Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities », Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, p. 141-158. DOI : 10.2307/1511201
Raskind, M. et Higgins, E. (1999). « Speaking to read: The effects of speech recognition technology on the reading and spelling performance of children with learning disabilities », Annals of Dyslexia, 49, p. 251-281. DOI : 10.1007/s11881-999-0026-9
Rao, K., Dowrick, P., Yuen, J. et Boisvert, P. (2009). « Writing in a multimedia environment: Pilot outcomes for high school students in special education », Journal of Special Education Technology, 24, p. 27-38.
Schmitt, A., McCallum, E., Hennessey, J., Lovelace, T. et Hawkins, R. (2012). « Use of reading pen assistive technology to accommodate post-secondary students with reading disabilities », Assistive Technology, 24, p. 229-239. DOI : 10.1080/10400435.2012.659956
Sider, S., & Maich, K. (2014). Outils de la technologie d’aide : À l’appui de l’apprentissage de la lecture et de l’écriture chez tous les apprenants dans la salle de classe inclusive. Repéré à http://apprendreenseignerinnover.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/FLDoutilsdelatechnologie.pdf
Silió, M. C. et Barbetta, P. M. (2010). « The effects of word prediction and text-to-speech technologies on the narrative writing skills of Hispanic students with specific learning disabilities », Journal of Special Education Technology, 25, p. 17-32.
SNOW. (2013). AT in the Individual Education Plan (IEP). Retrieved from http://www.snow.idrc.ocad.ca/node/219
Stetter, M. E. et Hughes, M. T. (2010). « Computer-assisted instruction to enhance the reading comprehension of struggling readers: A review of the literature », Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), p. 1-16.
Stodden, R. A., Roberts, K. D., Takahishi, K., Park, H. J. et Stodden, N. J. (2012). « The use of text-to-speech software to improve reading skills of high school struggling readers », Procedia Computer Science, 14, p. 359-362. DOI : 10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.041
Strangman, N. et Dalton, B. (2005). « Using technology to support struggling readers: A review of the research ». Cité dans D. Edyburn, K. Higgins et R. Boone (éd.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (p. 325-334). Whitefish Bay, WI : Knowledge by Design, Inc.
Sturm, J. M. et Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). « Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of students with learning disabilities », Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, p. 124-129. DOI : 10.1111/1540-5826.00039
Tam, C., Archer, J., Mays, J. et Skidmore, G. (2005). « Measuring the outcomes of word cueing technology », The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(5), p. 301-308. DOI : 10.1177/000841740507200507
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Swanson, E., Edmonds, M. et Kim, A. (2006). « A synthesis of spelling and reading interventions and their effects on the spelling outcomes of students with LD », Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, p. 528-543. DOI : 10.1177/00222194060390060501
Vaughn, S. et Bos, C. (2009). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behaviour problems (7e éd.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson.
Zabala, J.S. et Carl, D.F. (2005). Quality indicators for assistive technology services in Schools. Dans K. Higgins et R. Boone (dir.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (p. 179-208). Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin: Knowledge by Design Inc.
Zhang, Y. (2000). « Technology and the writing skills of students with learning disabilities », Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, p. 467-478.